Capital Markets

Under the Hood of the MSCI EM Index

Under the Hood of the MSCI EM Index
clock
2 min 55 sec

Remember the BRIC countries? The acronym was coined in 2001 by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O’Neill for the economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China to convey that their relative economic growth would continue to exceed that of the so-called Group of 7 (Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States) and thus their increasing global economic importance should be recognized by the G-7.

We don’t have to look back that far to see how much times have changed in the emerging markets from the heyday of the BRICs. Both Brazil and Russia have experienced recessions in the past decade, while India and China have continued to grow, and their stock markets have experienced much stronger returns than those of Brazil and Russia.

msci1-768x530

China in particular has become an increasingly large part of the emerging markets, and that has driven changes in both the country and sector weights in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Ten years ago, China was 13.9% of the index, and that weight has now more than doubled to 29.9%. Conversely, Brazil and Russia’s weights have both plummeted—Brazil’s by nearly half and Russia’s by more than half.

With the inclusion of China A-shares in the MSCI EM Index in 2018 (see Callan’s paper on this subject here), China’s relative index weight is expected to grow. China has not only the world’s second-largest economy but also its second-largest equity market, after the U.S. ($12 trillion versus $26 trillion as of March 31, 2018). Initially, the China A-share stocks included in the index will account for only 0.73% of the EM index. However, China’s weight within the EM Index, including the addition of A-shares and overseas-listed Chinese companies, is expected to swell from roughly 30% to over 40%. China, South Korea, and Taiwan are already 56.8% of the MSCI EM Index. In 2008, the top three countries of Brazil, China, and South Korea represented only 42.1% of the index.

msci2

Sector weights have also changed drastically in the past 10 years, with an overall shift to new economy sectors from cyclical, commodity sectors. Information Technology (26.7%), Financials (24.7%), and Consumer Discretionary (8.6%) now comprise 60% of the MSCI EM Index. A decade ago, the market was relatively less concentrated (the top three sectors represented 53.9% of the index), and two of the three largest sectors were energy and materials.

What does all this change mean for asset owners investing in emerging market equities?

  • Start with a review of your emerging market exposure. If you have active emerging market managers, consider their country and sector exposures relative to the index.
  • For instance, some active emerging market managers have been structurally underweight in China for reasons that include valuations and governance concerns. Managers should be able to explain the rationale of their China positioning.
  • In a multi-manager structure, country and sector positioning are factors to consider when reviewing whether manager exposures are complementary.
  • If your exposure to emerging markets is purely passive, consider the increasing level of concentration by country and sector, and whether exposure to emerging markets should be structured differently to mitigate these concentration risks.
  • As we look to the next decade, asset owners with large emerging market equity portfolios may consider having dedicated China exposure given the size and growth of the market.

One cautious note: As the diverging path of the BRIC economies and stock markets has shown us, past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Callan College banner

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Operations

Callan’s 2023 Capital Markets Assumptions: A Behind-the-Scenes Look

Capital Markets Research
This blog post details the process and reasoning behind the Callan Capital Markets Assumptions for 2023-2032, and provides detailed information about ...
Macro Trends

Hedge Funds and Ukraine: A Guide for Institutional Investors

Joe McGuane
Joe McGuane analyzes hedge fund performance in 2022 and how managers are handling the volatility stemming from the invasion of Ukraine.
Operations

A High-Level Summary of the Callan 2022-2031 Capital Markets Assumptions

Capital Markets Research
This blog post details the process and reasoning behind the Callan Capital Markets Assumptions for 2022-2031, and provides detailed information about ...
Public Markets

How Investors Should Respond to Evergrande and China’s Regulatory Crackdown

Fanglue Zhou
Fanglue Zhou analyzes how China's recent challenges impact institutional investors' emerging market allocations.
Operations

Three Potential Paths to a China A-Shares Allocation

Global Manager Research
We discuss three paths to implementing a China A-shares allocation.
Macro Trends

The Story Behind Callan’s 2021 Capital Markets Assumptions

Capital Markets Research
An explanation of Callan's 2021-2030 Capital Markets Assumptions, how they were developed, and what changed from last year's projections.
Macro Trends

Risky Business Update: Investors Face Additional Challenges amid Increased Uncertainty

Julia Moriarty
An update to our original research on how much risk investors need to take to achieve targeted returns over time.
Operations

Captive Insurance Stepped in to Ease Pandemic’s Blow. Now What?

Callan Institute
Captive insurers have been able to support their parent organization during COVID-19 by providing relief from business interruption losses.
Public Markets

GameStop, Reddit, and Efficient Markets

Mark Wood
What institutional investors should know about the wild price swings in GameStop shares.
Public Markets

Markets' Upward Trajectory Continues

Kristin Bradbury
A look at market performance in 4Q20 for global and U.S. equities, bonds, and real assets.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.