Defined Contribution

Two Questions Could Save Your DC Plan Millions

Two Questions Could Save Your DC Plan Millions
3 min 33 sec

In my recent paper, “Dear CFO: Two Questions Could Save Your Company Millions in Litigation Costs,” I addressed some of the challenges facing defined contribution (DC) plans in the current legal and regulatory climate and offered some recommendations for improving plans.

Here’s a summary of those two key questions and Callan’s views on how to address them.

After more than a decade of blistering litigation and regulatory enforcement actions, those in charge of defined contribution (DC) plans have received a clear message: Making decisions about other people’s money is a serious responsibility, and failing to carefully monitor plan expenses can be costly.

Spurred in part by this litigation, many fiduciaries are paying closer attention to this issue. The DC plan sponsors we track are focused on these priorities:

  • benchmarking plan fees
  • following a prudent process
  • keeping the sole benefit of their participants top-of-mind as they administer the plan

We believe these two questions will help identify whether your in-house plan fiduciaries are in-sync with this larger group we track or perhaps need assistance.

Question #1: Are our plan administration costs too high?

Executives who know the answer and act prudently not only help their participants save for retirement but also improve their companies’ odds of avoiding financial penalties. Finding this answer involves comparing one’s own plan administration costs to a) those observed in the marketplace, or b) to a set of competitive bids from service providers.

Fixing any issues found in this examination is pretty straightforward: Benchmark your fees. Use a vendor that has a deep recordkeeping fee database and/or the resources to blind-bid your plan in the marketplace to document your true expense options. We see the benefits of these actions first-hand for our clients: for the past few years recordkeeper fee benchmarking has resulted in average fee reductions of 30%.

Question #2: Are our DC plan participants getting the right “bang-for-the-buck” for their investment fees?

To set the context, we are largely talking about active management fees. For DC plans, sponsors must thoughtfully consider the case for active management and document the value proposition being purchased by plan participants. Regulations are clear that the standard is not to select the lowest-cost or best-performing fund for the DC plan menu. Thus if it is not about lowest-cost or best-performing, then it has to be about “relative value.”

We see two key questions that could arise in future DC fiduciary litigation about this “relative value” concept:

  1. What was the expected value the participants were paying for?
  2. Was the fee reasonable?

Our message is not that all active management is bad for DC plans, but that plan fiduciaries should fully understand and document the decision to use active management. The legal and regulatory scrutiny is growing, and active management fees are increasingly central to this scrutiny.

Exclusive use of passive funds in DC plans will not be optimal for fiduciaries in the long run either. For example, some very useful asset classes (e.g., corporate fixed income) can encounter periods of illiquidity that can be counter-productive to an index fund following a mechanical buying and selling methodology. Other increasingly popular asset classes in DC plans (e.g., real assets) are not easily implemented via an index methodology.

To be sure, we have many clients that use active management in their DC plans in what appears to be a defensible manner. Some hallmarks of their approach include:

  • Offering participants a “mirrored” set of active and passive investment options in asset classes where index methodologies work well, such as equities.
  • Conducting regular fee reviews with their investment managers that include reviews of investment vehicle and share-class options available to the plan.
  • Adhering to a strong governance program that documents plan fiduciaries conducted reasonable processes behind key decisions.

From our vantage point, plan sponsors that can make all this happen are those fortunate enough to have ample resources in terms of staff and committee members with the time and aptitude for this subject matter. We have many clients who do an excellent job managing their use of active management, and other investment consultants surely see the same in their practices as well.

Unfortunately we also see some plans that are less fortunate in terms of plan administration resources. For those plans, the option to outsource some of this responsibility may be worth some consideration.

Posted by

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Defined Benefit

The U.S. Economy, Now Open for Business

Jay Kloepfer
The U.S. economy may be on track for a truly eye-opening expansion, with initial projections pointing to growth rates of 9% or even higher for 2Q.
Defined Benefit

When the Passive Index Is an Active Decision

Weston Lewis
Because of differences in passive indices, investors should understand how the one they choose will affect benchmarking.
Defined Benefit

Capital Markets Assumptions and the Future

Greg Allen
CEO and Chief Research Officer Greg Allen analyzes how Callan's capital markets assumptions have compared to actual returns.
Defined Benefit

SEC Division of Examinations Issues ESG Risk Alert

Thomas Shingler
The Division issued the Risk Alert to 1) communicate its observations from past examinations and 2) address the Division’s areas of focus during upc...
Defined Benefit

Equities Off to a Strong Start; Inflation Fears Haunt Bonds

Kristin Bradbury
U.S. equities outpaced global stocks in 1Q21. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield hit its highest intraday yield in 15 months during the quarter.
Defined Benefit

2021—Starting Off with Gusto!

Kristin Bradbury
How the economy did in 1Q21, and the outlook ahead.
Defined Benefit

What We Found in Our Latest COVID-19 Survey of Investment Managers

Amy Jones
The 3rd edition of our Coping with COVID-19 survey of investment managers focuses on plans for office reopenings and vaccination policies.
Defined Benefit

The Story Behind Callan’s 2021 Capital Markets Assumptions

Capital Markets Research
An explanation of Callan's 2021-2030 Capital Markets Assumptions, how they were developed, and what changed from last year's projections.
Defined Benefit

Bloomberg Barclays Pricing Time Change and What It Means for Institutional Investors

Kyle Fekete
Asset owners, investment managers, and other parties may experience discrepancies in reporting point-in-time pricing or performance as a result.
Defined Benefit

Why the Yield Curve Is Really Curving

Dario Buechi
As prospects for growth have brightened, yields on longer maturity bonds have risen while short-term rates have been anchored by the Fed.