Defined Benefit
Defined Contribution
Insurance Assets
Nonprofit

Exclusive Callan Study Analyzes Investment Management Fees Paid by Institutional Investors

Exclusive Callan Study Analyzes Investment Management Fees Paid by Institutional Investors
clock
3 min 47 sec

Callan’s 2021 Investment Management Fee Study, our ninth analysis of what institutional investors pay for asset management, examines fee levels and trends across multiple asset classes and mandate sizes, for both active and passive management. The study reflects trends for 2020 fees, and the data for this study were collected and curated using Callan’s proprietary investment manager database, actual client fee schedules, and Callan’s proprietary client performance reporting database.

Our fee dataset includes mandates run by over 300 investment firms for over 160 institutional investors, representing $598 billion in assets under management (AUM) and $1.4 billion in total fees paid. The study covers a total of 21 different asset classes, both public and private. It also encompasses many institutional mandate vehicle types including separate accounts, commingled funds (including collective investment trusts), and various partnership types. Mutual funds are excluded from this study.

In this blog post, I’ll lay out the methodology we used to conduct this survey and highlight some of our key findings. The full study can be accessed through the link above.

The actual fee dataset for client mandates was derived from client fee schedules and our performance reporting database. We next reviewed the resulting raw dataset for completeness and accuracy. The final clean dataset was then categorized by parameters such as active/passive, asset class, account size, inception date, and investment manager product. Unique mandate size ranges for analyzing each asset class were determined, balancing practical relevance with sufficient sample sizes. Throughout the study these actual client fees are labeled as “mandate actual” data.

By cross-referencing the manager products and mandate sizes in the actual fee dataset with the “published” or “standard” fee schedules for those products, we calculated the theoretical published fee (non-negotiated) for those same mandates. These theoretical client fees are labeled as “mandate published” data. This more focused view of published fees is very useful as it represents the starting fee ranges for successfully competitive products.

In order to provide a broader view of the competitive fee landscape, we also include the range of published fees for all products in the relevant asset class universe (regardless of having any client mandates). This range of published fees is labeled as “universe published.” Comparing this broader universe of published fees with the successful mandate published fees can be useful in determining what levels of published fees are competitive.

investment management fees

For each asset class, we show current industry fees from these three perspectives to illustrate and compare the fees for the total competitive landscape, the published fees for those products successfully winning mandates from Callan clients (pre-negotiation), and the actual fees those clients ended up paying in 2020 (reflecting any negotiated discounts). We also break down the analysis for each asset class by mandate size, and we show the distribution of fees across the full range of individual data points. Finally, we calculate the average discount between mandate published and mandate actual fees.

Other Ways Investment Management Fees Were Analyzed

We also analyzed the fee environment in a number of other ways, including:

  • Vintage Analysis: Compares current actual fees for more recently incepted mandates (2016 and after) with those of older mandates (2015 and before) to better measure fee trends over the long term.
  • Concentration Analysis: Examines the concentration of AUM, mandates, and actual fees/revenues by investment firm for each asset class.
  • Fee Data: In addition to fees paid in basis points, we analyze average mandate sizes and average fees paid in dollars to gain insights into the health of the asset management industry.

Among our key findings:

  • 97% of total fees paid in the study went to active managers (a 1% decline from our last study in 2019).
  • Fees were also concentrated; 50% of total active fees went to 11% of the investment management firms.
investment management fees
  • The highest average basis point fees went to hedge fund-of-funds (117 bps) and private real assets (84 bps).
  • The lowest went to passive U.S. large cap (2 bps) and passive core fixed income (3 bps).
  • Fee resilience was strongest for managers of private real assets, global ex-U.S. equity, and global ex-U.S. small cap equity.
  • Total asset class dollar fees were down the most for U.S. large cap equity and hedge fund-of-funds.
  • 38% of total study assets were passively managed, up 8% from 2019.
  • U.S. smid/small/micro cap equity and U.S. large cap equity saw the largest increases in passive usage.
  • Separate accounts were the most popular investment vehicle by far, at 62% of the products in the dataset.
  • Public funds represented the largest share of assets under management by percent of mandates (44%) and percent of assets (68%).

For a full breakdown of fee levels by asset class, please find our study at the link below.

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Private Markets

2024 Private Equity Fees and Terms Study: Lessons for Institutional Investors

Ashley Kahn
This study analyzes private equity fees and terms to help institutional investors.
Operations

Inaugural Study Reveals How Asset Managers Incorporate DEI into Their Core Business

Laura Dawson
Callan's 2024 Asset Manager DEI Study examines how investment managers approach diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in their own firms.
Operations

Exclusive 2023 Study Analyzes Investment Management Fees for Institutional Investors

Ivan "Butch" Cliff
Butch Cliff summarizes his comprehensive look at investment management fees paid by institutional investors in 2022.
ESG

Callan Study Examines ESG Practices by Investment Managers

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury summarizes our 2023 Asset Manager ESG Study.
Private Markets

Our First Private Credit Fees and Terms Study: What We Found in 2023

Alternatives Consulting Group
We provide a summary of our Callan 2023 Private Credit Fees and Terms Study
Operations

DC Plans Continue Laser-Focus on Fees, Exclusive Callan Survey Finds

Jamie McAllister
Jamie McAllister provides a high-level summary of the 2022 DC Trends Survey.
Private Markets

What We Found in Our Latest Private Equity Fees and Terms Study

Ashley Kahn
Ashley Kahn updates our annual Private Equity Fees and Terms Study with a significantly larger dataset.
Operations

Callan’s Fee Study Highlights Key Industry Trends

Ivan "Butch" Cliff
Operations

Two Questions Could Save Your DC Plan Millions

DC Consulting Group
In our recent paper, “Dear CFO: Two Questions Could Save Your Company Millions in Litigation Costs,” we addressed some of the challenges facing ...
ESG

ESG’s Regional Regulatory Conundrum for Managers

Callan Institute

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.