Defined Benefit
Insurance Assets
Nonprofit

What We Found in Our Latest Private Equity Fees and Terms Study

What We Found in Our Latest Private Equity Fees and Terms Study
clock
3 min 32 sec

In a comprehensive update to our inaugural effort in 2020, Callan conducted our 2021 Private Equity Fees and Terms Study by analyzing 187 private equity partnerships, representing fund offerings in the market from 2018 through August of this year that were reviewed by Callan. This study is intended to help institutional investors better evaluate private equity funds, serving as an industry benchmark when comparing a partnership’s terms to its peers. It can also be useful for general partners, to determine how their fees and terms compare to other managers.

We focused on the following principal terms to provide a concise snapshot of the market:

  • Minimum limited partner (LP) commitment
  • General partner (GP) commitment
  • Management fees
  • Type of “waterfall”
  • Carried interest percentage
  • Preferred return

With this year’s study, we found consistency in some terms compared to our last study, but with some notable differences. These differences are more reflective of the specific funds included rather than broader changes to private equity terms. The biggest impact on the results stemmed from the increase in Callan’s coverage of small buyout and venture capital (VC) funds, which tend to have different management fees and carried interest levels than other strategies.

private equity

By strategy, the dataset is weighted toward buyout funds, which represented 68% of the partnerships. In terms of geography, the study is dominated by North American and global strategies, at 90% of the dataset. It also included a small portion of European strategies at 7% and Asian strategies at 2%.

Key findings of this year’s private equity study:
  • Despite the pandemic, partnership terms continued to remain predominantly GP-friendly.
  • After a dip in fundraising in 2020, demand for private equity in 2021 strengthened, resulting in many oversubscribed funds and quick fundraises.
  • Minimum LP Commitment: Similar to the 2020 study, $10 million remained the most common minimum LP commitment, representing 49% of the dataset.
  • GP Commitment: The median GP commitment has hovered around 2.5%-3.0% over the last four years with the aggregate median at 3.0%. The average has been slightly higher, ranging from 3.5%-5.1%.
  • Management Fee: We captured both the management fee paid during the investment period (typically the first 5-6 years of a fund’s life) as well as after. The median management fee during the investment period was 2.00%, a large jump from our last study, which showed 1.75%. The average also increased from 1.76% to 1.81%. These jumps reflect the expansion of the data set to include more VC and small buyout strategies, which tend to have higher fees, and fewer large buyouts, which tend to have lower fees.
private equity
  • Similarly, we also saw an increase in management fees post the investment period, from a median of 1.50% in our last study to 1.75%.
  • During the investment period, management fees are almost always paid as a percentage of committed capital, which typically drops to invested capital post the investment period.
private equity
  • Management Fee Offset: Every fund in the dataset offset management fees by any transaction, monitoring, or other fees paid to the GP. Most had a 100% management fee offset, although a few funds had a 99%, 80%, or 50% offset.
  • Waterfall Type: Most funds had either an American (deal-by-deal) waterfall or a European (fund-as-a-whole) waterfall, meaning that carried interest is either paid to the GP on a per investment basis (more GP-friendly) or on a cumulative basis across all investments (more LP-friendly). The majority of the dataset had an American waterfall.
  • Carried Interest: The most common carried interest percentage was 20%, with 86% of funds at this level.
  • Preferred Return: The median preferred return has consistently been 8%. None of the funds had a higher preferred return. Many, principally VC and growth equity funds, did not have any kind of a preferred return.
  • GP Catch-Up: We added the GP catch-up to this study for partnerships reviewed in 2020 and 2021, referring to the distribution of profits to GPs until they “catch up” to their full portion of cumulative carried interest, after the preferred return has been met. 87% of funds had a 100% GP catch-up.

With each year, the study’s dataset will broaden and become increasingly representative of the private equity industry. A larger dataset will enable our Alternatives Consulting group to expand our analysis to incorporate even more relevant comparisons of the private equity industry, to help institutional investors make more informed decisions about their private equity programs.

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Operations

Emerging Managers in Private Equity: A Guide for Success

David Smith
David Smith provides a guide for institutional investors that want to consider emerging managers for their private equity programs.
Private Markets

3Q22 Private Equity Activity Dips but Reflects Pre-Pandemic Levels

Gary Robertson
Gary Robertson analyzes private equity activity through all stages of the investment cycle in 3Q22.
Private Markets

Private Equity Shows Persistence Amid Volatile Markets

Gary Robertson
Gary Robertson provides an analysis of private equity activity in 2Q22, from fundraising to exits to returns.
Private Markets

The Fading Unicorn: How Volatility, Inflation, and Rate Hikes Impact Venture Capital

Ashley Kahn
Ashley Kahn explains the impact of rising inflation, interest rate hikes, and market volatility on venture capital portfolios.
Macro Trends

Bubbles Bursting Everywhere

Janet Becker-Wold
Janet Becker-Wold explains how recent bubbles inflated and what their popping means for institutional investors.
Private Markets

Where Do Private Equity Investors Go From Here?

Gary Robertson
Gary Robertson analyzes private equity activity through all the stages of the investment cycle, from fundraising to exits and returns.
ESG

Initiative Aims to Standardize ESG Reporting for Private Equity Investors

Aidan Davison
Aidan Davison explains the data convergence project and what it might mean for ESG efforts within private equity.
Operations

DC Plans Continue Laser-Focus on Fees, Exclusive Callan Survey Finds

Jamie McAllister
Jamie McAllister provides a high-level summary of the 2022 DC Trends Survey.
Private Markets

For Private Equity, a Big Bounce Back in 2021

Gary Robertson
Gary Robertson analyzes fundraising, investments, exits, and returns for all private equity categories for 4Q21 amid markets affected by COVID-19.
Operations

DOL Shifts Tone on Private Equity in DC Plans

Patrick Wisdom
Patrick Wisdom analyzes the new DOL guidance on the role of private equity in DC plans.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.