Defined Benefit
Defined Contribution
Insurance Assets

When the Passive Index Is an Active Decision

When the Passive Index Is an Active Decision
3 min 51 sec

We recently worked with a client as it was evaluating a passive investment in large cap U.S. equity. After a discussion about the two most common indices used to represent the large cap U.S. equity market and what would be most appropriate for this investor, a committee member made a very interesting observation:

“It sounds to me like selecting an index to track is an active decision.”

At first blush, the main large cap indices do not seem all that different. The S&P 500 Index shares a correlation of 0.997 with the Russell 1000 Index, two of the most prominent large cap indices (and as their names indicate, one tracks the top 500 stocks by market capitalization, with some exceptions as I will describe later, and the other the top 1,000).

But it turns out they can be quite different, and looking at them through the lens of calendar year 2020 returns validates this statement. Choosing an index series for your passive manager to track can indeed be an active decision. When an index provider does anything to exclude companies offered by the broad “market,” that decision can lead to different outcomes.

The S&P 500 is seen by many market participants as the large cap index, because it is one that stakeholders readily recognize. It has also proven to be a hard index for active large cap managers to beat. While it is a reasonable index for benchmarking … it is not “the broad market” as it excludes companies that do not meet its profitability criteria.

This dynamic is demonstrated by a hypothetical investment structure that imitates many institutional U.S. equity implementations:

Implementation Structure and Benchmark

The structure above envisions passive large cap equity (benchmarked to the S&P 500), and active management for small cap equity (collectively benchmarked to the Russell 2000). Like so many institutional investors, this committee benchmarks its total U.S. equity allocation to the Russell 3000. In 2020, the S&P 500 gained 18.4%; the Russell 2000 rose 20.0%. Combine the two and you should be close to your total U.S. equity benchmark, the Russell 3000. But the Russell 3000 beat both large and small cap benchmarks with a return of 20.9% for the year.

Unless this program had a small cap manager, or managers, that outperformed the benchmark Russell 2000 by 32% in 2020, this structure underperformed the Russell 3000 Index. In other words, by selecting the S&P 500 instead of the Russell 1000 for its large cap exposure, this investor was left with near-term underperformance.

Rolling 4-Quarter Excess Return Relative to Russell 3000 for 5 Years Ended 12.31.20 v2

The performance differences in 2020 were unique for a couple of reasons. The first is Tesla, which was included in the Russell 1000 index, but not the S&P 500 until December. Tesla had a calendar year-to-date return of close to 700% before it was included in the S&P 500. And there were other companies that are included in Russell but not in the S&P that helped drive this performance difference. The S&P 500 excludes those that do not meet a financial viability hurdle; Russell has no such exclusion. Many unprofitable technology companies also saw outsized gains in 2020, leading to a divergence between the two indices.

To be included in the S&P 500 (and the S&P Composite series) a company must exhibit financial viability in the form of four straight quarters of GAAP profits. However, by requiring a company to turn a profit, the index provider has taken the first step toward making an active management decision. Why stop there? Why not also exclude companies that have unserviceable levels of debt? And here we begin walking down the slippery slope to alternative beta—effectively making active decisions about passive implementation. This is not to express the opinion that asset owners shouldn’t favor companies that are profitable or viable. This is just to make the point that if an institutional investor is seeking to replicate the broad market return, it needs to accept all that the broad market provides.

The takeaway for fiduciaries: know your indices. All have subtle differences that might lead to performance differences like those experienced in 2020. FTSE Russell, S&P Dow Jones, MSCI, and CRSP all have different capitalization definitions for large, mid, or small cap. As a practical matter, the most notable difference between S&P and all the others is the profitability criteria. While 2020 was extreme, this criteria will likely create more issues with benchmarking going forward.

Indexing best practices:

  1. Know the basics of your index, both what your passive manager may be tracking and what you may be benchmarking your active managers against or your asset class composite against.
  2. Be mindful when marrying different index families in the structure.
  3. Periodically review asset class structures to understand and quantify any bias and/or misfit risk.

Posted by

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Defined Contribution

Lost but Not Forgotten: DOL Guidance on Missing Participants

Jana Steele
Jana Steele explains how new regulatory guidance on missing participants affects DC plan sponsors.
Defined Benefit

The Role of Real Estate and Infrastructure Debt in a Portfolio

Munir Iman
Jan Mende and Munir Iman discuss real estate and infrastructure debt and their potential roles in institutional portfolios.
Defined Benefit

Strong Quarter for Real Estate, Both Public and Private

Munir Iman
Munir Iman discusses private real estate and REIT activity during 2Q21.
Defined Benefit

Second Verse, Same as the First for Private Equity

Gary Robertson
Gary Robertson analyzes fundraising, investments, exits, and returns for all private equity categories for 2Q21 amid markets affected by COVID-19.
Defined Benefit

Hedge Funds Thrive amid Surging Recovery

Jim McKee
Jim McKee assesses hedge fund and MAC performance in 2Q21 and analyzes the outlook for these asset classes.
Defined Contribution

Department of Labor Provides Cybersecurity Guidance

Benjamin Taylor
An excerpt from an article by Ben Taylor on new cybersecurity guidance.
Defined Benefit

GPs Take ‘Credit’ for Higher IRRs

Jonathan Farr
Jonathan Farr explains subscription credit facilities and how they impact private markets returns.
Defined Benefit

Three Potential Paths to a China A-Shares Allocation

Ho Hwang
Ho Hwang discusses three paths to implementing a China A-shares allocation.
Defined Benefit

PCE and CPI: What’s the Difference?

Fanglue Zhou
Fanglue Zhou explains how CPI and PCE differ and why the Fed prefers the PCE.
Defined Benefit

Gains for Just About Every Asset Class in 2Q21

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury assesses how U.S. and global stock, fixed income, and real assets markets performed in 2Q21.