Defined Benefit
Insurance Assets
Nonprofit

The Road to Building Better Infrastructure Benchmarks

The Road to Building Better Infrastructure Benchmarks
clock
2 min 52 sec

“Measure what you treasure” may sound trite, but it is at the heart of how institutional investors evaluate the performance of their portfolios. For private infrastructure allocations, “measuring that treasure” with the appropriate infrastructure benchmarks is more difficult than for other parts of institutional portfolios, even other private markets investments, given the shorter history of the asset class and its growing diversity of investments by type, location, and revenue-generation approach.

As they consider the most relevant benchmarks, institutional investors first need to determine the role infrastructure plays in their portfolio. Is it a core investment meant to yield appreciation and income? A fixed income replacement? A higher-octane investment focused on long-term value creation? Or is it some combination of these?

In the past, institutional investors have used a variety of benchmarks for infrastructure equity investments:

  • Inflation-linked (e.g., CPI + 4%)
  • Absolute return
  • Listed (i.e., public) infrastructure indices
infrastructure benchmarks

Listed infrastructure benchmarks have been more impacted by periods of market volatility and probably less useful than absolute return and inflation-linked benchmarks. Additionally, the opportunity set for public/listed infrastructure is different than the typical portfolio mix targeted by private infrastructure managers. At the same time, investors are starting to question the use of inflation-linked benchmarks given the recent spike in prices for consumers and producers, meaning absolute return benchmarks have become more popular.

How Infrastructure Benchmarks Are Evolving

As infrastructure matures as an asset class, the potential for more useful benchmarks will grow. Infrastructure initially started as part of institutional investors’ private equity portfolios, with high target returns and closed-end structures of 10-12 years. But now the range of investable options has expanded to include core (perpetual vehicles), value add, and potentially even opportunistic strategies, similar to the universe in private real estate.

Private real estate investors often use the NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core Equity (NFI-ODCE) as a benchmark, but there is no equivalent for infrastructure. The open-end infrastructure universe is less homogeneous than the ODCE universe (with more diversity in terms of country and sector exposure), and the number of open-end infrastructure funds with a track record of more than five years is limited.

Over time this will change; there are close to 15 open-end infrastructure funds in operation or about to launch, which could be useful for creating an ODCE-like index for the infrastructure sector. For comparison, there are 38 funds in the ODCE, which started with an inception date of Dec. 31, 1977.

infrastructure benchmarks

One key question to address: “Is the manager achieving the objectives that it set out with, and how does it compare with peer funds?” At the moment, that is challenging for open-end funds because of the paucity of managers with longer track records, but as they mature, peer comparisons will become more practical. There are more closed-end funds operating, making peer comparisons more useful, but investors still need to understand the sectors and geographies their closed-end fund managers are targeting to make a better assessment of the relevant benchmark.

The good news for investors is that “measuring what they treasure” in their infrastructure portfolios will become increasingly sophisticated as the asset class continues its evolution and as more funds come to market to cater to the growing number and variety of institutional investors that are making allocations to this asset class. Investors will need to carefully decide on their benchmarks depending on the role of infrastructure in their portfolios and the investing approach of their managers, but the expansion of the asset class will provide them with more choices as they make those decisions.

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Defined Benefit

PCE and CPI: What’s the Difference?

Fanglue Zhou
Fanglue Zhou explains how CPI and PCE differ and why the Fed prefers the PCE.
Defined Benefit

Changing Horses Midstream: Why We Released Preliminary 2023 CMAs Now

Jay Kloepfer
Jay Kloepfer explains why we released the preliminary 2023-2032 Capital Markets Assumptions.
Defined Benefit

Private Real Estate Strong; REITs Lag Equities

Munir Iman
Private real estate performed well in 2Q22 while REITs lagged equities. Real assets saw widespread drops.
Defined Benefit

Tough Environment Leads to Losses for Hedge Fund Managers

Joe McGuane
Joe McGuane analyzes hedge fund and MAC performance in 2Q22.
Defined Benefit

Private Equity Shows Persistence Amid Volatile Markets

Gary Robertson
Gary Robertson provides an analysis of private equity activity in 2Q22, from fundraising to exits to returns.
Defined Benefit

Private Credit Interest Still High Despite Illiquidity Premium Close to Zero

Catherine Beard
Catherine Beard analyzes the performance of private credit in 2Q22 and explains what is happening with its illiquidity premium.
Defined Benefit

Recession—Are We There Yet?

Jay Kloepfer
Jay Kloepfer analyzes the U.S. and global economies in 2Q22 and explains why we are not technically in a recession.
Defined Benefit

The Fading Unicorn: How Volatility, Inflation, and Rate Hikes Impact Venture Capital

Ashley Kahn
Ashley Kahn explains the impact of rising inflation, interest rate hikes, and market volatility on venture capital portfolios.
Defined Benefit

Bubbles Bursting Everywhere

Janet Becker-Wold
Janet Becker-Wold explains how recent bubbles inflated and what their popping means for institutional investors.
Defined Benefit

Few Bright Spots as Markets Continue to Drop

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury recaps how the global markets performed in 2Q22.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.