Capital Markets

Non-U.S. Bias Rewarded Plans in 2017

Non-U.S. Bias Rewarded Plans in 2017
clock
2 min 39 sec

Endowments/foundations (+3.8%) performed best last quarter, followed by public plans (+3.7%), Taft-Hartley plans (+3.6%), and corporate plans (+3.5%). For all funds, the return was +3.7%, according to Callan’s database. Plans with assets below $100 million performed best by fund size, up 3.7%, compared to 3.6% for both medium plans ($100 million-$1 billion) and large plans. A quarterly rebalanced 60% S&P 500/40% Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index portfolio rose 4.1% during the quarter.

Marking a turn of events, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index outperformed U.S. equity markets over the past year, rewarding funds that have taken steps to diversify away from a home-country bias. Over longer periods of time, Taft-Hartley plans did best over the last five years, up 9.3% annualized. Corporate plans (+5.9%) did best over the last 10 years.

Callan Fund Sponsor Returns for the Quarter

Plans continue to focus on an environment marked by low interest rates, low return expectations, and frustration with the seemingly high cost of diversification while the public equity market has enjoyed such a strong run. Many fund sponsors feel compelled to take on substantial market risk to reach return targets, and are now focusing on finding sources of diversification within the growth bucket of their asset allocation. Sponsors are examining if there is anything more they can do to tamp down the risk within the growth allocation, short of actually reducing the allocation to growth assets.

Asset owners continue to be skeptical of the value of active management, particularly in U.S. large cap equity. Pressure to reduce fees or show the ability to generate consistent alpha has been building for quite some time. Some fund sponsors have undertaken structure work to consider the amount of active versus passive management and to see if there is a way to simplify their manager rosters to gain economies of scale in an effort to reduce costs.

As in past quarters, funds have adjusted their allocations in these ways over the last five years:

  • Corporate plans have widened their range of U.S. fixed income allocations, as they are in different stages of efforts to de-risk plan assets.
  • Many public funds have increased their allocation to non-U.S. equity and real estate at the expense of fixed income. Simultaneously, some of the fixed income exposure has become more equity-like in nature.
  • Endowments and foundations continue to shift from fixed income to asset classes with higher return expectations, such as global equity, non-U.S. equity, and real estate.

The regulatory environment continues to drive the decision-making process for defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors. Heightened fee sensitivity and litigation have resulted in little traction for non-traditional asset classes such as liquid alternatives. DC plans are also focused on the best ways to reduce/eliminate revenue sharing, as well as obtaining even lower fees from investment managers. They are also looking for opportunities to continue streamlining investment fund lineups to achieve sufficient diversification while minimizing participant confusion—including white label options.

Public plans continue to seek return enhancement and further diversification. Reduced capital market return expectations and funding challenges have created a difficult situation for many public DB plans, and some plans are simply constrained by their circumstances. Alternative beta, MACs, and other liquid strategies are being used in a wide range of capacities and are experiencing increased interest.

3.7%

The return of all types of funds, according to Callan’s database

Callan College banner

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Operations

How Your Public DB Plan's Returns Compare | 2Q23 Update

Public DB Plan Focus Group
Callan Public DB Plan Focus Group provides an update on plan returns and analysis of how they compare over time.
ESG

The ESG Rule Explained, Part 1: Fiduciary Principles

ESG Consulting Group
Tom Shingler interviews a legal expert on the ESG rule issued by the Department of Labor.
Operations

How Your Public DB Plan's Returns Compare | 1Q23 Update

Public DB Plan Focus Group
Callan Public DB Plan Focus Group provides an update on plan returns and analysis of how they compare over time.
Operations

Financial Wellness: Is It the Right Prescription for Your DC Plan?

Jana Steele
Jana Steele provides a summary of her recent white paper on financial wellness options for DC plans.
Operations

DOL Proposes Tightened Proxy Voting Guidelines

Patrick Wisdom
The department’s new proposal dovetails with SEC guidance finalized in 2020 and would create a refined set of circumstances in which plan fiduciarie...
Operations

Fine-Tuning Implementation of the CARES Act

Jana Steele
The IRS has issued two notices and a FAQ to clarify how defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors should implement the provisions of the act, touching o...
ESG

DOL Calls for Stricter Rules Around ESG Investing in Retirement Plans

Thomas Shingler
Operations

Our DC Index Had a Noteworthy First Quarter

Patrick Wisdom
Operations

DOL Issues Common-Sense Information Letter About Private Equity in DC Plans

DC Consulting Group
Operations

Callan Survey: DC Plan Response to CARES Act Varied by Industry and Recordkeeper

Jana Steele

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.