Defined Benefit
Defined Contribution
Nonprofit

Survey: ESG Incorporation Nearly Doubles in 5 Years; Those Considering It Jumps

Survey: ESG Incorporation Nearly Doubles in 5 Years; Those Considering It Jumps
clock
2 min 36 sec

Each year, Callan surveys institutional investors to better understand their views on environmental, social, and governance principles, and the trends driving ESG adoption. In our recently published 2020 ESG Survey, we found that 42% of respondents incorporated ESG into their investment decision-making process, in line with the previous year’s level. But that figure has nearly doubled from the 22% of investors that incorporated ESG in 2013.

As significantly, we found that 33% of respondents not yet incorporating ESG were considering doing so, the highest in the survey’s history and nearly triple the level in 2019. This brings the ratio of those either incorporating or thinking about incorporating ESG to 61% of the total respondent pool in 2020.

Share of Respondents Considering ESG Incorporation
  • This year’s ESG Survey, conducted in mid-2020, reflects input from 102 U.S. institutional investors. For this survey, ESG factors include socially responsible investing (SRI, including divestment), sustainable investing, impact investing, and other associated terms. Respondents include public and corporate DB and DC plans, as well as endowments and foundations, ranging in assets under management from small (under $500 million) to large (more than $20 billion). The largest share of respondents (41%) is from the government sector.

Survey highlights:

  • Investor type: Public plans (36%) have incorporated ESG factors into the investment decision-making process at a slightly higher rate than their corporate counterparts (32%), but this level of incorporation was still dwarfed by that of endowments (63%) and foundations (57%).
  • Investor location: ESG adoption was highest by plans in the Northeast and on the West Coast.
  • Those not incorporating it: Despite the trends toward adoption, 56% of respondents did not incorporate ESG into investment decision-making—although as noted earlier, a third of those are considering it.
  • Motivations: The most frequently cited reason for incorporating ESG among respondents was to address stakeholder concerns. Conversely, the most frequently cited reason for not incorporating ESG was because the benefits of ESG incorporation were unproven or unclear. When comparing early adopters’ motivations for incorporating ESG versus recent adopters, recent adopters were more likely to be addressing stakeholder concerns and to be focused on an improved risk profile, while early adopters were focused on alignment with their organization’s values and impact.
Reasons-for-ESG-Incorporation-by-Investor-Type-768x696
* Multiple responses allowed
  • Allocations: Only 19% of respondents maintain an ESG allocation separate from their traditional portfolio, indicating broader ESG integration is preferred.
  • Implementation: Over half of respondents that incorporate ESG have communicated ESG’s importance to their investment managers, consider ESG with every investment/investment manager selection, and added ESG language to their IPS.
  • Coronavirus impact: 60% of respondents said the global COVID-19 pandemic has had no impact on their planned ESG initiatives, while 14% believed the pandemic will cause them to increase their rate of ESG adoption.
  • Product interest: Active U.S. equity (33%) led the list of strategies those implementing ESG would like to see more of, followed by active emerging market equity (28%).
  • Future direction: 37% of respondents that have incorporated ESG factors in investment decision-making do not plan to make any changes to their usage of ESG factors in the coming years.

This blog post provides a high-level overview of our survey findings. For the entire survey, with detailed data and analysis, please click below.

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Defined Contribution

Lost but Not Forgotten: DOL Guidance on Missing Participants

Jana Steele
Jana Steele explains how new regulatory guidance on missing participants affects DC plan sponsors.
Defined Benefit

The Role of Real Estate and Infrastructure Debt in a Portfolio

Munir Iman
Jan Mende and Munir Iman discuss real estate and infrastructure debt and their potential roles in institutional portfolios.
Defined Benefit

Strong Quarter for Real Estate, Both Public and Private

Munir Iman
Munir Iman discusses private real estate and REIT activity during 2Q21.
Defined Benefit

Second Verse, Same as the First for Private Equity

Gary Robertson
Gary Robertson analyzes fundraising, investments, exits, and returns for all private equity categories for 2Q21 amid markets affected by COVID-19.
Defined Benefit

Hedge Funds Thrive amid Surging Recovery

Jim McKee
Jim McKee assesses hedge fund and MAC performance in 2Q21 and analyzes the outlook for these asset classes.
Defined Contribution

Department of Labor Provides Cybersecurity Guidance

Benjamin Taylor
An excerpt from an article by Ben Taylor on new cybersecurity guidance.
Defined Benefit

GPs Take ‘Credit’ for Higher IRRs

Jonathan Farr
Jonathan Farr explains subscription credit facilities and how they impact private markets returns.
Defined Benefit

Three Potential Paths to a China A-Shares Allocation

Ho Hwang
Ho Hwang discusses three paths to implementing a China A-shares allocation.
Defined Benefit

PCE and CPI: What’s the Difference?

Fanglue Zhou
Fanglue Zhou explains how CPI and PCE differ and why the Fed prefers the PCE.
Defined Benefit

Gains for Just About Every Asset Class in 2Q21

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury assesses how U.S. and global stock, fixed income, and real assets markets performed in 2Q21.