Defined Benefit
Defined Contribution
Insurance Assets

The ESG Rule Explained, Part 3: Shareholder Rights

The ESG Rule Explained, Part 3: Shareholder Rights
3 min 23 sec

The Department of Labor late last year issued the ESG and proxy voting rule, officially called the Final Rule on Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights. (Here’s our blog post on the announcement of the rule.)

This blog post, based on a recent ESG Research Café with Callan’s ESG Practice Leader Tom Shingler and Richard Ashley, partner and co-chair of the US Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation practice at DLA Piper, is one in a series that focuses on the main aspects of the ESG rule and highlights some of the ways in which it is the same and ways in which it differs from the regulatory guidance issued during the Trump administration.

Tom Shingler: What are the key features as it relates to exercising shareholder rights in this rule?

Richard Ashley: I think it’s important to note that the rule starts with a basic construct. And the idea is that in connection with being an investment fiduciary, the process of maintaining your fiduciary duties will include the exercise of shareholder rights, or the decision to exercise shareholder rights with respect to an investment in common stock. In that vein, the idea of exercising shareholder rights is a consideration of both whether to exercise those shareholder rights and when to exercise those shareholder rights.

So as a fiduciary goes through that process, it has to act in accordance with the economic interests of the participants and beneficiaries and in accordance with the duties of prudence and loyalty. It has to consider the costs involved because there are situations where the costs involved in deciding to exercise a shareholder right or vote may be outweighed by the benefit associated with exercising that shareholder right.

So the costs have to be considered as a fiduciary is making a decision about whether and when to exercise shareholder rights. To the extent that a fiduciary is selecting another party to exercise or decide whether and when to exercise shareholder rights, it has to exercise prudence and diligence in the selection and the monitoring of the service that it chooses to use to exercise those rights on behalf of the plan with respect to that stock.

So the main construct and the differences here in connection with the new regulation are really around elimination of some of the recordkeeping requirements that were expressed in the original (Trump era) regulation and trying to put the exercise of shareholder rights and voting of proxies on a level that’s equal to but not greater than the other fiduciary obligations in connection with investments. The rule says that a fiduciary needs to think about adopting policies or practices.

And it cannot merely adopt a policy of deciding that it is going to follow whatever the proxy voting firm it hired will do in connection with proxy voting, but it has to look at that voting policy and then decide as it relates to the plan whether or not those voting policies are consistent with the financial objectives of the plan or in the best interest of participants and beneficiaries, and make sure that as that agreement moves forward, it is monitoring that third party to make sure that it is consistently acting in accordance with those voting policies.

The periodic review construct is one that puts a more active tone to what it means to be a fiduciary with respect to the exercise of shareholder rights.

There are additional rules that allow proxy voting firms and investment managers to adopt their own policies and to provide that plan fiduciaries that are hiring them must agree to the voting policies as a condition to the investment.

Fiduciaries are going to be in a position where they really need to evaluate what is happening on the ground and make a decision to either move toward modifying those directions or asking for proxy voting firms to comply with their own established voting policy as a condition of engagement. So there will be some additional back and forth here with respect to how proxy voting and the exercise of shareholder rights occur in connection with this fiduciary construct.


The Callan Institute (the “Institute”) is, and will be, the sole owner and copyright holder of all material prepared or developed by the Institute. No party has the right to reproduce, revise, resell, disseminate externally, disseminate to any affiliate firms, or post on internal websites any part of any material prepared or developed by the Institute, without the Institute’s permission. Institute clients only have the right to utilize such material internally in their business.

Posted by

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts

The Newest and Final 'Fiduciary Rule'

Jana Steele
What the Department of Labor's Final Fiduciary Rule means for DC plan sponsors.

Callan 2024 DC Trends Survey: Focus on Plan Governance, and Continued Efforts to Rein in Fees

Jamie McAllister
A summary of Callan's 2024 Defined Contribution Trends Survey.

SEC Releases Final Climate Disclosure Rules

Kristin Bradbury
An explanation of the final SEC climate disclosure rules and what they mean for institutional investors.

The Heat Is On! Carbon-Footprinting Basics for Institutional Investors

Amit Bansal
Amit Bansal explains what carbon-footprinting means for institutional investors.

Callan Study Examines ESG Practices by Investment Managers

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury summarizes our 2023 Asset Manager ESG Study.

IRS Announces Updated Retirement Plan Limits for 2024

Jamie McAllister
Jamie McAllister details the 2024 DC plan limits.

Key Issues to Know for the Proposed Fiduciary Rule

Jana Steele
Jana Steele explains what the new proposed fiduciary rule means for DC plan sponsors.

IRS Delays SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-ups

Jana Steele
Jana Steele explains why the IRS delayed rules for Roth catch-up contributions.

S&P Global Moves Away from Numeric ESG Credit Indicators

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury explains why S&P Global dropped its numeric credit indicators and what it means.

Callan Discount Rate Reporter: June 2023

Corporate DB Plan Focus Group
This blog post is one in a series of monthly updates about the impact of interest rates on corporate defined benefit (DB) plans.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.