Defined Benefit
Defined Contribution
Insurance Assets

The ESG Rule Explained, Part 2: DC Plan Lineups

The ESG Rule Explained, Part 2: DC Plan Lineups
3 min 9 sec

The Department of Labor late last year issued the ESG and proxy voting rule, officially called the Final Rule on Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights. (Here’s our blog post on the announcement of the rule.)

This blog post, based on a recent ESG Research Café with Callan’s ESG Practice Leader Tom Shingler and Richard Ashley, partner and co-chair of the US Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation practice at DLA Piper, is one in a series that focuses on the main aspects of the ESG rule and highlights some of the ways in which it is the same and ways in which it differs from the regulatory guidance issued during the Trump administration.

Tom Shingler: The qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) is where participants are invested if they don’t make an election in a defined contribution (DC) plan. What is this rule saying about ESG incorporation in QDIAs?

Richard Ashley: I think the most important part is what it’s not saying. The way the regulation is constructed, the formulation of a QDIA involves the same construct of a risk-return analysis that would be appropriate for any other kind of investment. And instead of singling out the QDIA to say that it cannot use a nonpecuniary factor, what the rule is saying is that when a fiduciary conducts a risk-return analysis, whatever is appropriate in making that risk-return analysis, which can include ESG as an economic factor, can be used in setting the QDIA for a particular plan.

In that regard, it’s very different from the original regulation during the Trump administration, which in essence prohibited the consideration of any nonpecuniary factor in putting a QDIA in place.

Tom: Another new addition in the specific language of this rule is regarding participant preferences in constructing a DC plan lineup. What is it saying a fiduciary can do in terms of considering participant preferences, and in what context?

Richard: The way this comes into the regulation is this idea of the rules regarding the investment duties of loyalty. And we start with the main premise that a fiduciary cannot subordinate the interests of the participants and beneficiaries in their retirement income or financial benefits to other objectives. And when a fiduciary is making decisions, it cannot sacrifice return or take additional risk for the purpose of promoting other goals.

So that sort of forms the baseline for this discussion. But when you look at what is happening with respect to a particular DC plan, the regulation is clear that a fiduciary of a participant-directed individual account plan will not violate its duty of loyalty when putting together an investment menu if it is taking into account the participant’s preferences consistent with the ordinary fiduciary process that is laid out for the investment fiduciary to go through in selecting an investment.

So to the extent that an ESG investment is something that participants would like to see and it might increase participation, the fiduciary can take that into account in selecting a menu of investment options as part of an investment platform. But at the same time, that preference does not substitute for the ordinary prudence obligation of a fiduciary. The decision still has to be the selection of a prudent investment alternative that makes sense given relative risk and return.

Tom: So a fiduciary cannot put in an ESG fund that does not meet the other criteria simply because of participant preference. That would not be prudent.

Richard: Exactly. To the extent that an ESG fund takes on massively more risk for the same return or had substantially underperformed what would be a non-ESG fund at the same risk level, that has to be a part of the analysis as a fiduciary is putting together an investment menu. The fiduciary always has to go through the prudence process.


The Callan Institute (the “Institute”) is, and will be, the sole owner and copyright holder of all material prepared or developed by the Institute. No party has the right to reproduce, revise, resell, disseminate externally, disseminate to any affiliate firms, or post on internal websites any part of any material prepared or developed by the Institute, without the Institute’s permission. Institute clients only have the right to utilize such material internally in their business.

Posted by

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts

The Newest and Final 'Fiduciary Rule'

Jana Steele
What the Department of Labor's Final Fiduciary Rule means for DC plan sponsors.

Callan 2024 DC Trends Survey: Focus on Plan Governance, and Continued Efforts to Rein in Fees

Jamie McAllister
A summary of Callan's 2024 Defined Contribution Trends Survey.

SEC Releases Final Climate Disclosure Rules

Kristin Bradbury
An explanation of the final SEC climate disclosure rules and what they mean for institutional investors.

The Heat Is On! Carbon-Footprinting Basics for Institutional Investors

Amit Bansal
Amit Bansal explains what carbon-footprinting means for institutional investors.

Callan Study Examines ESG Practices by Investment Managers

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury summarizes our 2023 Asset Manager ESG Study.

IRS Announces Updated Retirement Plan Limits for 2024

Jamie McAllister
Jamie McAllister details the 2024 DC plan limits.

Key Issues to Know for the Proposed Fiduciary Rule

Jana Steele
Jana Steele explains what the new proposed fiduciary rule means for DC plan sponsors.

IRS Delays SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-ups

Jana Steele
Jana Steele explains why the IRS delayed rules for Roth catch-up contributions.

S&P Global Moves Away from Numeric ESG Credit Indicators

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury explains why S&P Global dropped its numeric credit indicators and what it means.

Callan Discount Rate Reporter: June 2023

Corporate DB Plan Focus Group
This blog post is one in a series of monthly updates about the impact of interest rates on corporate defined benefit (DB) plans.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.