Defined Benefit
Defined Contribution
Insurance Assets

SEC Proposes Rule to Enhance and Standardize Climate-Related Disclosures

SEC Proposes Rule to Enhance and Standardize Climate-Related Disclosures
2 min 55 sec

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) unveiled its proposed rule amendments designed to improve and standardize disclosures around climate change risks for public companies, an area in which the U.S. has lagged developed market peers. The SEC received a significant number of comments pertaining to this initiative from a wide variety of stakeholders and impacted parties over the past year. Impressively, the 500-page proposal includes an in-depth review of the comments and poses numerous other questions for the public to address in the current comment period, which ends June 17.

Background on the SEC Rule on Climate-Related Disclosures

In March, the SEC released its long-awaited proposal for public companies to disclose climate-related risks and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in financial statements. This initiative began in March 2021 at the bidding of the Biden administration, and the SEC has reviewed and considered 600 letters since that time.

The proposal seeks to provide investors more information about the impact that climate-related risks may have on company financial performance and to standardize other climate-related disclosures, to the extent possible. Importantly, the SEC also acknowledged the burden of compliance and took measures to mitigate that burden by phasing in the requirements and providing smaller companies with an exemption for certain emissions disclosures.

The SEC’s stated goal is important to acknowledge: “The disclosure of this information would provide consistent, comparable, and reliable—and therefore decision-useful—information to investors to enable them to make informed judgments about the impact of climate-related risks on current and potential investments.”

The proposed rule was modeled after the Task Force on Climate-Related Disclosure framework and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, both of which are globally recognized as leading reporting frameworks for climate change and GHG emissions disclosures.

Key disclosure requirements of the proposed rule to be phased in over time include:

  • How climate-related risks are being assessed by a company’s board/management
  • Whether climate-related risks are likely to have a “material” impact on financials, operations, or the business strategy over the short-, medium-, and long-term
    • opportunities related to climate change can also be addressed
  • Metrics in audited financial statements that assess the potential impact of transition activities related to a shift to a greener economy and physical climate-related events (severe weather and other environmental conditions)
    • discussion of whether and how any climate-related risks affect financial statements
    • whether estimates and assumptions used were impacted by exposures to climate-related risks
  • Disclosure of Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions (with an attestation)
  • Disclosure of “material” Scope 3 emissions
    • exempts small firms (less than $250 million in market cap or less than $100 million in revenue)
    • given potential difficulty in data collection and measurement, required only if emissions are “material” or if the company has a stated GHG emissions reduction target or goal that includes Scope 3 emissions
  • Explanation of how publicly stated climate-related goals (including cutting emissions) will be achieved, including targets and timeframe, and how they will be measured (plan for carbon offsets must be described, if used)

Bottom Line

The proposed rule is a clear step forward in terms of improving and standardizing disclosures for public companies, but challenges remain measuring emissions in terms of complexity and varying methodologies. Further, the concept of “material”—central to the rule—is somewhat subjective. Because disclosures are currently voluntary and lack consistency in terms of content and timing, the rule in its ultimate form is expected to improve transparency and yield more consistent disclosures around a variety of climate-related issues to the benefit of investors. To help mitigate the burden of compliance, the requirements would be phased in over time and exempt smaller companies from some emissions disclosures.

Posted by

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts

Biodiversity: A Relatively New Theme for ESG-focused Investors

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury discusses the relatively new type of ESG thematic investing focused on biodiversity.

President Biden Vetoes Congressional Bill to Overturn ESG and Proxy Voting Rule

Thomas Shingler
On March 20, 2023, President Biden vetoed legislation that would have blocked the enactment of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) final rule released ...

Energy Transition Is Having a Moment, but Does It Have Staying Power?

Jan Mende
Jan Mende describes energy-transition investments and how they can be incorporated into the portfolios of institutional investors.

DOL Issues Final ESG and Proxy Voting Rule

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury and Tom Shingler analyze the DOL's Final Rule on ESG and proxy voting.

Callan Survey Sees First Decline in ESG Incorporation Since 2019

Thomas Shingler
Tom Shingler and Hannah Vieira describe the findings of our 2022 ESG Survey.

Green Financing in Residential Real Estate

Aaron Quach
Christine Mays and Aaron Quach explain green financing and how it can help investment managers obtain more favorable financing terms.

SEC Proposes Rule to Enhance ESG Disclosures for Investments for Funds and Advisers

Kristin Bradbury
The proposal is designed to help investors assess the degree to which ESG considerations are a part of a strategy.

Initiative Aims to Standardize ESG Reporting for Private Equity Investors

Aidan Davison
Aidan Davison explains the data convergence project and what it might mean for ESG efforts within private equity.

Sustainable Real Assets Portfolios Enter the Mainstream

Barbara Bernard
Barbara Bernard discusses five key benchmarks for real assets.

The Supreme Court Weighs in on Northwestern DC Case

Jana Steele
Jana Steele explains the implications of the Supreme Court's Northwestern ruling for DC plan sponsors.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.