Best Practices

Have We Learned the Lessons of the GFC About Liquidity?

Have We Learned the Lessons of the GFC About Liquidity?
4 min 16 sec

After a 10-year bull market in equities, the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) may seem like a distant memory. Yet the financial lessons of those times should be branded into our memory as fiduciaries. As financial markets collapsed, the lack of liquidity across all asset classes had serious consequences and limited the ability of institutional investors to effectively raise short-term capital to meet spending obligations.

Many nonprofits were forced to liquidate assets at deep discounts; some had to sell private assets on the secondary markets; and, in extreme cases, others were forced to borrow. As the crisis continued, spending rates for organizations with flexibility declined, resulting in fewer scholarships, lower grants, reduced staff, and delayed capital investments. As nonprofit portfolios suffered losses in public equity and fixed income allocations, their relatively large allocations to illiquid private investments grew to represent an even larger percentage of portfolios, oftentimes in excess of allowable ranges as defined by investment policy statements.

And allocations to illiquid private assets have only continued to rise over the last decade as investors sought out diversified sources of return in an environment of low capital market projections. While most investor-types have participated in this trend, endowments and foundations have been at the forefront of the movement. According to the NACUBO-TIAA Study of Endowments, between 2007 and 2018 allocations to alternatives have jumped from 40% to 58% for endowments over $1 billion, and from 33% to 41% for those between $501 million-$1 billion, an increase of 45% and 24%, respectively! The pattern is similar for smaller organizations.

Callan believes illiquid investments deserve a place in portfolios for their diversification benefits and differentiated return sources. However, a true understanding of their liquidity profile, and how changes in liquidity may affect the total portfolio and the organization, is critical.

Liquidity management begins with understanding cash flow requirements and constraints. Consider reviewing the following every year:

  • What are the cash flow needs of your organization for the next 6, 12, and 18 months to cover mission-related support, the operational budget, capital expenditures, etc.?
  • What percentage of that is supported by endowment funds?
  • What are the projected inflows, and can they change in a stressed environment?
  • How much uncalled capital is outstanding and how much is anticipated to be called in the next 12 to 24 months? The impact of leverage on the uncalled capital must also be reviewed periodically, since it may exacerbate liquidity needs. Managers may be tapping lines of credit in lieu of calling all the capital they are investing. If their lines of credit are pulled, investors can expect larger capital calls.
  • Are you maintaining a cushion to fund new investment opportunities during times of financial stress? The inability to fund new investments will further negatively impact long-term returns and portfolio liquidity.

The answers to these questions will help you better understand the amount of liquidity necessary to maintain current operations and ultimately enable you to develop an asset allocation plan consistent with enterprise-level needs. With these questions addressed, we also recommend performing a liquidity stress test.

While asset allocation is critical to overall portfolio positioning, understanding your portfolio’s liquidity position also depends on evaluating the underlying investment strategies and vehicles used to implement the investment policy. At its most basic, creating liquidity classifications for each vehicle in your portfolio will offer you a view of where your portfolio stands. Liquidity classifications should be based on the time horizon to liquidate the position, ranging from highly liquid daily publicly traded vehicles to highly illiquid multi-year private investments. Below is a sample classification that can be used as a starting point.

Sample liquidity classification table

In stressed environments liquidity can change for various reasons. For example, open-ended real estate funds and hedge funds could impose gates, and liquidity can be extended from quarterly to one to two years. In addition, private real estate and private equity managers could extend the life of the fund and delay distributions, and capital calls could increase. A simple classification of your liquidity profile is helpful, but modeling your liquidity profile in both normal and stressed environments will provide insights into how much illiquidity the organization is actually able to tolerate.

Scenario testing is also critical. For instance, assume annual outflows will be taken from liquid investments and build in various negative market scenarios from the probable to the extreme. Consider both quick and shallow events as well as long and protracted. How long could your organization continue to support the mission without disrupting the investment program or reliving the scenarios faced by many in 2008? Does your organization have liquidity buckets designated for immediate cash needs in such environments? Does your organization have a line of credit? (But note, during the GFC many institutions found banks withdrew lines of credit.)

Organizations have increased their allocations to illiquid investments, and concurrently we find ourselves in the longest bull run in the history of the stock market. Given where we are in the market cycle, and the return of market volatility in late 2018 and more recently, now is a good time to re-evaluate liquidity levels and portfolio positioning so as not to relive the scenarios that preceded the last decade.

Callan College banner

Posted by

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts

Biodiversity: A Relatively New Theme for ESG-focused Investors

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury discusses the relatively new type of ESG thematic investing focused on biodiversity.

Callan Survey Sees First Decline in ESG Incorporation Since 2019

Thomas Shingler
Tom Shingler and Hannah Vieira describe the findings of our 2022 ESG Survey.
Macro Trends

Bubbles Bursting Everywhere

Janet Becker-Wold
Janet Becker-Wold explains how recent bubbles inflated and what their popping means for institutional investors.

Capital Markets Assumptions and the Future

Greg Allen
CEO and Chief Research Officer Greg Allen and Senior Vice President Julia Moriarty analyze how Callan's capital markets assumptions have compared to a...

Total Expenses for Institutional Investors Fell 5% From 2015, Callan Survey Finds

Ivan "Butch" Cliff
Our 2021 Cost of Doing Business Survey examines total fund expenses and external investment management fees, as well as custody costs and other fund e...

Callan Survey Finds Nearly 50% of Respondents Incorporate ESG, Highest Level Ever

Thomas Shingler
Tom Shingler provides key takeaways from the Callan 2021 ESG Survey.
Public Markets

GameStopped—Or Just Getting Started?

A key issue highlighted by GameStop is the unintended consequences of zero-cost money and commission-free trading enabled by today’s highly stimulat...

Nonprofits and the Pandemic: What to Do Now

Karen Heifferon
For nonprofits, this environment creates unique challenges, with many organizations not only contending with the health crisis but also the impact of ...

Quarterly Results for Institutional Investors Reflect the Initial Impact of the Pandemic

Stephen Trousdale

Rebalancing in a Time of Volatility

Millie Viqueira

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.