Defined Benefit
Insurance Assets

The Gray Areas in Green Bonds

The Gray Areas in Green Bonds
3 min 5 sec

Issuance of green bonds, which finance projects with a positive environmental impact, has exploded in recent years, and the space is expected to continue to show steady growth. Callan believes that active management is important for institutional investors that seek exposure to this segment of the market.

The first green bond was issued by the European Investment Bank in 2007 to finance renewable energy and energy efficiency projects (a focus on climate change is common for these types of bonds). Issuance is now commonly seen by sovereign entities, corporations, and from across municipal and securitized sectors.

The green bond market reached $1 trillion in outstanding debt at the end of 2020, according to the Climate Bonds Green Bond database. We expect issuance to continue to gain momentum given robust demand from investors that are keen to address climate change concerns by helping finance the global transition to cleaner energy.

Total Green Bond Issuance by Year (in millions)

A common challenge for those investing in green bonds is that there is no uniform set of requirements or standards. This makes analysis and monitoring more critical as a simple “green” label is no assurance that the use of proceeds, or the issuer itself, meets desired objectives.

The International Capital Markets Association’s Green Bond Principles is one framework, but compliance is voluntary. These principles were updated in 2018 and provide guidelines for disclosures from issuers. Separately, the Climate Bond Initiative (CBI) provides a green bond certification for issuers, and while it is considered to be the gold standard, there is a fee for this certification, and an “approved verifier” needs to ensure that the bond meets the required CBI standards. This is a difficult hurdle for some smaller issuers. Its standards are designed to ensure that issuance aligns with the Paris Climate Agreement to limit climate warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius.

Many are working hard to develop a widely accepted set of standards, but this important goal remains a work in progress. As a result, an important nuance has emerged: a differentiation between “labeled” and “unlabeled” green bonds. Labeled green bonds must meet certain certifications, as noted above. But active managers should have the resources and skills to ascertain whether a bond meets its environmental impact objectives regardless of the label it carries. These two examples provide some context on the challenge:

  • A labeled green bond that is “gray”: A Spanish oil and gas company issued a green bond in which proceeds were used to finance energy efficiency initiatives. However, some market participants may consider financing a bond that improves efficiency for a fossil fuel company as being incongruent with “green” goals and objectives.  
  • An unlabeled bond that is “green”: A privately owned mobile home park provides affordable housing for local workers and residents in a high-income area. It issued a bond, and a portion of the proceeds were earmarked for solar panels atop existing parking structures and buildings to lower electricity costs for residents. This issuance, which was not labeled “green,” provides positive societal and environmental impacts and thus fits well for a “green-minded” investor. 

Bottom line: Active fixed income management is key to identifying and analyzing green bond projects and issuers in the absence of global standards. Further, we believe it is important to evaluate the ESG characteristics of the issuer. If an issuer does not meet minimum ESG standards, then the use of proceeds may or may not make the investment appropriate for ESG-minded investors. Also, active management allows for relative value considerations to be incorporated into security selection decisions. In some cases, green bonds may command a premium due solely to the label. Finally, there is no assurance that a green bond issuer will use the proceeds as promised, so ongoing monitoring is essential.

Posted by

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Defined Benefit

Alignment of Interests: Best Practices to Make Sure Investors and Their Managers Are in Sync

Jan Mende
Jan Mende discusses how institutional investors can make sure their interests are aligned with their private markets investment managers.
Defined Benefit

Investing in Data Centers: The Real Assets of the Digital Age

Lauren Sertich
Lauren Sertich provides a summary of her recent paper on investing in data centers.
Defined Benefit

Rising Interest Rates Spur Look at Structured Credit

Nathan Wong
Nathan Wong explains the potential appeal of structured credit in a rising rate environment.
Defined Benefit

Hedge Fund Strategies: A Guide for Institutional Investors

Joe McGuane
Joe McGuane describes the key attributes of hedge funds and how institutional investors should evaluate them.
Defined Benefit

SEC Proposes Rule to Enhance ESG Disclosures for Investments for Funds and Advisers

Kristin Bradbury
The proposal is designed to help investors assess the degree to which ESG considerations are a part of a strategy.
Defined Benefit

Where Do Private Equity Investors Go From Here?

Gary Robertson
Gary Robertson analyzes private equity activity through all the stages of the investment cycle, from fundraising to exits and returns.
Defined Benefit

Unprecedented Territory—and the Inherent Limits of Diversification

Jay Kloepfer
Jay Kloepfer discusses the concurrent declines in the equities and fixed income markets at the beginning of 2022.
Defined Benefit

Geopolitical Upheaval and Unsettled Markets

Jay Kloepfer
Jay Kloepfer analyzes the U.S. and global economies at the start of the year amid geopolitical upheaval and market volatility.
Defined Benefit

Private Credit Appeals to Investors in a Low-Yield Environment

Catherine Beard
Catherine Beard analyzes private credit trends for 2021 and the start of 2022.
Defined Benefit

Market Volatility Tests Hedge Fund Managers

Joe McGuane
Joe McGuane analyzes hedge fund and MAC performance in 1Q22 amid the volatile market environment.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.