Capital Markets

Emerging Markets and SOEs

State-Owned Enterprises and Emerging Markets: What You Need to Know
clock
3 min 28 sec

One of the biggest differences between developed and emerging market equities involves the ownership structures of companies in the two areas. Most developed market companies, measured by index weight, are widely held with a dispersed investor base, according to MSCI. In comparison, the largest share of emerging market companies are state-owned enterprises (SOEs), in which local or state governments have significant (typically greater than 20%) ownership control.

For SOEs, government ownership can be structured in multiple ways; some governments or government entities may own portions of companies indirectly through a variety of vehicles including central banks, sovereign wealth funds, or holding companies. Others may have varying levels of direct state ownership. As of Dec. 31, 2018, SOEs represented 26% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.

Since most global investors have exposure to both developed and emerging markets, we wanted to highlight the differences between these ownership characteristics. These distinctions are also relevant for institutional investors that incorporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles into their investing process, since ownership is a key consideration for “G.” Given the importance of SOEs within emerging markets, institutional investors should be aware of these key points:

  • State ownership appears to be more concentrated among public goods sectors than private sectors. The Utilities, Energy, and Financials sectors tend to demonstrate the most state ownership. These sectors tend to include strategic state assets such as banks, utilities, and natural resources companies, which have large capital-expenditure burdens. Conversely, governments tend to be less involved in Consumer, Information Technology, and Health Care companies, which tend to be less vital for the strategic economic development and welfare of emerging market governments.
Percentage of State Control in the MSCI EM Index
  • Of the larger countries in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, the proportion of state ownership is highest in Russia (51%) and China (43%). Two Middle Eastern countries, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, have the highest rates overall at 95% and 94%, respectively.
SOEs as Percent of Market Capitalization for Major Countries in the MSCI EM Index
  • As China became the largest single country (33%, as of March 31, 2019) within the MSCI EM Index, its SOEs translated to nearly 15% of the benchmark. While SOEs dominate the Energy and Financials sectors in China, they exist within all sectors, including Technology and Health Care. However, this situation could change. In recent years, under mixed-ownership reforms, many Chinese state-owned businesses have been through a methodical process of privatization and are now less influenced by the government. As a result, the number of enterprises administered by the central government fell to 98 in 2018 from 117 in 2012.
  • Emerging market SOEs tend to offer relatively high dividend yields when compared to the broad emerging market. This is more commonly seen in Chinese SOEs following recent reform initiatives. In general, many of the SOEs that provide a higher dividend are in regulated businesses such as banks, communications, utilities, and energy. Governments of emerging market countries believe that encouraging SOEs to have more accommodative dividend policies may raise revenue and increase the flexibility of government spending. The dividend revenue can also provide support to government programs. For example, Chinese governments have assisted the relocation of workers due to the closure of “zombie” firms as part of the country’s SOE restructuring.
  • Active managers appear to have various research approaches when it comes to SOEs. Even though there are concerns around the misalignment between government interest and those of minority shareholders, it is uncommon for asset managers to restrict SOE investments given that government influence, whether direct or indirect, still widely exists in the emerging markets. They do, however, consider governance structure, management credibility, and other qualitative factors as it relates to both SOEs and privately held businesses. In contrast, some managers choose to restrict owning SOEs due to concerns over more indebted balance sheets and lower growth rates.
Callan College banner

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Capital Markets

What Investors Should Know About This Year’s Russell Reconstitution

David Wang
Capital Markets

The Fed Speaks: ‘A Mid-Cycle Adjustment to Policy’

Jay Kloepfer
Capital Markets

Quarterly Results for Institutional Investors Reflect the Initial Impact of the Pandemic

Stephen Trousdale
Capital Markets

Why Bankruptcies by States Are Unlikely

Kristin Bradbury
Capital Markets

Toughest Quarter Since GFC for Real Assets

David Welsch
Capital Markets

Fed Sends Strong Message, but More Needed

Kristin Bradbury
Capital Markets

Behind Our 2020-2029 Capital Market Assumptions

Jay Kloepfer
Capital Markets

Impact of the Coronavirus on Markets: The Long-Term View

Mark Wood
Capital Markets

Assessing the Impact of the Coronavirus for Institutional Investors

Jay Kloepfer
Capital Markets

The Most Anticipated Recession in History Fails to Materialize

Jay Kloepfer

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.