Defined Benefit
Defined Contribution
Insurance Assets
Nonprofit

Cut Rates, Shut Government—and Stocks Rally!

Cut Rates, Shut Government—and Stocks Rally!
clock
4 min 41 sec

3Q25 was marked by the intersection of policy and markets. A government shutdown capped the quarter after partisan gridlock over spending priorities, while the Federal Reserve delivered its first rate cut in nine months. Equities extended their rally on the back of resilient earnings and an unusually strong September, a month that has historically been weak for U.S. stocks. Abroad, activity was supported by fiscal and monetary accommodation, and global ex-U.S. equities built on their year-to-date leadership. Yet beneath the surface, stretched valuations, persistent inflation, and elevated policy uncertainty left investors with plenty to weigh as the quarter closed.

U.S. Policy and the Economy in 3Q25

The U.S. bull market extended in 3Q as steady economic activity and ongoing enthusiasm for AI helped offset anxieties around trade policy and stubborn inflation. The overall effective U.S. tariff rate was estimated at 17%, according to the Yale Budget Lab, the highest level since 1935. While some companies have absorbed the costs, the effects are increasingly visible in certain sectors, such as consumer staples, where margins have come under pressure. Several lower courts have ruled that the president overstepped on specific tariffs (including reciprocal duties and China fentanyl-related retaliation), with the final decision expected from the Supreme Court later this year.

Trade policy uncertainty was soon eclipsed by the federal budget standoff, which ended in a government shutdown. At the center of the dispute were disagreements over spending priorities, including health care subsidies. The shutdown has forced several government agencies, including the Bureau of Labor Statistics, to suspend publishing and collecting economic data—an important input into Federal Reserve decision-making. For context, the longest prior shutdown began in late 2018 during President Trump’s first term and lasted roughly five weeks.

The Federal Reserve approved a quarter-point cut to the Fed Funds Rate in September, its first reduction in nine months. The new target range of 4.00%–4.25% marked the lowest level in nearly three years, as officials judged that labor market softness outweighed still-stubborn inflation. Eleven Fed governors supported the move, with newly appointed governor Stephen Miran the only one dissenting, voting in favor of a larger half-point cut. The FOMC’s updated dot plot indicated expectations for one to two additional cuts by year-end, though one member projected as much as 125 basis points of further easing. Markets welcomed the cut, with equities extending their rally into quarter-end and Treasury yields easing modestly along the curve.

Both headline and core inflation remained sticky in 3Q25, staying above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. The Fed’s preferred measure, core PCE, rose 0.2% in August and 2.7% year-over-year, little changed from prior months. CPI-U also ticked higher, with headline inflation up 2.9% year-over-year and core CPI up 3.1%. Goods prices firmed across several categories, reflecting tariff pass-through and labor shortages tied to tighter immigration policies. Meanwhile, consumer spending stayed resilient, rising 0.6% in August after a 0.5% gain in July, highlighting that demand may have yet to meaningfully cool despite elevated prices.

The labor market continued to soften across multiple indicators. Job growth slowed and the unemployment rate climbed to 4.3%, its highest level in four years. The BLS Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed slower hiring and fewer voluntary quits, which is consistent with easing labor demand. Consumer sentiment weakened further as the Conference Board’s Confidence Index fell in September to its lowest reading since April, with respondents citing persistent concerns over job availability. Retail sales, however, surprised to the upside, rising 0.6% in August and beating expectations, signaling that household spending capacity has not yet been exhausted. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model revised its 3Q25 growth estimate upward to 3.9% annualized, compared to 3.1% earlier in the month. Meanwhile, the BEA’s final estimate confirmed that 2Q25 real GDP had expanded at a 3.8% annualized pace.

Global Macroeconomics

The OECD upgraded its global growth outlook in September, reflecting stronger-than-expected resilience in the first half of 2025. It now projects G20 GDP growth of 3.2% for 2025, up from its 2.9% forecast in June, citing front-loaded demand ahead of tariff measures and AI investment activity. Looking ahead, the OECD expects growth to moderate, projecting G20 GDP easing to 2.9% in 2026 as labor markets soften in advanced economies and private consumption slows.

Monetary policy remained divergent across major developed economies. The ECB held its policy rate at 2.15% in September, after eight consecutive cuts since June 2024. President Christine Lagarde reiterated that inflation is expected to stabilize at the 2% target over the medium term. The Bank of England also kept rates steady at 4.0% following a series of five quarter-point cuts this year, cautioning that inflation could temporarily rise before trending back toward target. Meanwhile, the Bank of Japan maintained its policy rate at 0.5%, pausing to assess the impact of U.S. tariffs and broader global demand on Japan’s export sector.

Political instability in France and Japan added to global uncertainty. In France, President Emmanuel Macron appointed his fifth prime minister in under two years, tasking him with delivering a 2026 budget and a credible path to deficit reduction. Fitch downgraded France’s sovereign rating to A+ from AA-, citing the country’s high debt burden and persistent political gridlock that has hindered fiscal reform. In Japan, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s resignation deepened political turmoil, marking the nation’s third leadership change in five years. Despite the upheaval, Japan’s economy showed resilience. 2Q GDP expanded at a 1.0% annualized rate, following 0.6% growth in 1Q, supported by robust auto exports as automakers partially offset U.S. tariff headwinds by absorbing costs rather than passing them to consumers.

China entered 3Q under pressure from weakening manufacturing, mounting deflationary concerns, and continued property-sector stress. Manufacturing PMI contracted for a sixth consecutive month, underscoring persistent weakness in industrial activity. Deflationary signals also lingered, with consumer and producer prices declining year-over-year. In September, Beijing announced plans to deploy RMB 500 billion (~$70 billion) in policy-based financial tools to accelerate infrastructure and investment projects, alongside new measures to curb overcapacity in key industries, reflecting policymakers’ attempt to stabilize growth and shore up confidence.

Closing Thoughts

This quarter reinforced that we are living in “interesting times.” Some celebrate policy shifts, others cheer an unprecedented bull market, and many are simply navigating the constant churn of news. Yet markets, and people, move forward by adapting and finding common ground. With Thanksgiving around the corner, it’s a fitting reminder that engaging across perspectives can broaden understanding, whether in policy debates, investment outlooks, or around the dinner table. As always, but especially in periods of stretched valuations and safe-haven rallies, Callan encourages investors to keep a long-term perspective and a prudent asset allocation with appropriate levels of diversification.

Disclosures

The Callan Institute (the “Institute”) is, and will be, the sole owner and copyright holder of all material prepared or developed by the Institute. No party has the right to reproduce, revise, resell, disseminate externally, disseminate to any affiliate firms, or post on internal websites any part of any material prepared or developed by the Institute, without the Institute’s permission. Institute clients only have the right to utilize such material internally in their business.

Posted by

Share
Related Posts
Macro Trends

Imports Do Not Change GDP Growth (But They May Have an Impact Eventually)

Jay Kloepfer
Imports do not affect the calculation of GDP, our expert explains.
Macro Trends

Wait for It … Little Impact on Economy So Far from Tariffs

Jay Kloepfer
Callan expert analyzes the economy in 2Q25.
Macro Trends

Tariffs, Tax Cuts, and ‘TACO’: What a Quarter!

Kyle Fekete
This blog post explores the global economy in 2Q25 and the issues facing institutional investors.
Macro Trends

Time to Prepare for an Uncertain Stretch in the U.S. Economy

Jay Kloepfer
Callan expert analyzes the U.S. and global economies in 1Q25.
Macro Trends

The First, Very Turbulent, 100 Days

Kyle Fekete
Callan expert assesses the global economy in 1Q25.
Macro Trends

The Recession Never Came, so Now What?

Jay Kloepfer
An analysis of the U.S. economy as we head into 2025.
Macro Trends

Hawkish Cuts and Stormy Skies for U.S. Economy

Kyle Fekete
Callan expert analyzes the global markets and macroeconomy in 4Q24.
Macro Trends

Strong U.S. Economy Refuses to Cooperate

Jay Kloepfer
Jay Kloepfer analyzes the U.S. economy in 3Q24 and the outlook ahead.
Macro Trends

Election Tension but No Sign of That in the Markets

Kyle Fekete
Callan expert explains the major trends shaping the global economy as the U.S. election approaches.
Macro Trends

Can the Fed Stick the Landing?

Jay Kloepfer
Callan expert analyzes the 2Q24 global economy and Federal Reserve policy.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.